|
Myths and
misconceptions of dog food.
Some of
you have probably heard numerous claims about pet foods using "human
grade," "antibiotic and hormone free," "meat based" etc. and do not know
what to believe anymore. Below I will try to address some of the claims
that are really half truths and that could be construed as being
misleading.
First let
us say that federal labeling law precludes pet food manufacturers from
including "misleading" statements on their bag. For example: Some say
that they use only antibiotic and hormone free chicken, lamb etc. That
is not exactly true. It is against federal law for chicken to be labeled
as hormone free. That's because growers may not use hormones on
chickens. To label your chicken as hormone free would imply that your
chickens are the only ones that are hormone free when in fact they all
are! What happens with other animals used for human consumption is that
they must test free of hormones, antibiotics or pesticides before
slaughter. It usually takes three to five days to clear their systems of
any chemicals. Those animals that are earmarked for slaughter are kept
free of chemicals for several days and then butchered. When I think of
"antibiotic and hormone free" I think of an animal that has been raised
chemical free, not just for a few days. A play on words perhaps but
borderlines on fraud. Ask if it is Certified Organic, "pasture grazed
only" or imported from a country that restricts the use of chemicals if
that is what you want. Of course you will pay a lot more.
Another
one is: "Our meat comes from USDA inspected plants".
All
slaughter houses that process for human consumption must be USDA
inspected.
One
natural dog food company claims: "Digest is the full guts including the
manure".
Not true.
It is made from whatever it is named for (chicken digest, liver digest
etc.) and is digested by enzymatic activity and then dried. We do not
use digest in our formulas but there is nothing wrong with it.
A natural
food supplement maker that lists molasses as the second ingredient
claims: "We use molasses because it is a nutrient not a sugar.
Molasses
contains many nutrients and is technically not a sugar but it contains
60% sugars by weight and 20% water. Maybe it is not thought of as a
sugar in Fufu Land but most
of the world uses it as a sweetener. Dogs love sugar and it is added
mostly for palatability. If sugar must be used to help preserve a
product, then Molasses would of course be better than sucrose or
dextrose, but only if it is necessary.
The
same supplement maker also claims: "Our product contains natural enzymes
and probiotics that are naturally present in food".
Even if
that were true, because you are only adding 1 teaspoon of supplement, it
would only contain enough enzymes to assist in digesting that one
teaspoon. If you ask them what the enzyme levels are they will not tell
you. That is because they are so low they cannot be measured. If you
want to replace the enzymes in a food lost due to processing you must
add enough to assist in digesting the full amount of food you are
feeding or the amount that was present in that full amount of food when
it was in it's raw state. This is expensive to do however.
My
favorite is "Made with only 100% human grade ingredients."
One quick
way to determine if this is not true (other than cost) is if the food
contains any "meals". Guess what? There is no such thing as human grade
chicken meal or lamb meal. I know of no restaurant where you can say
"Waiter, may I have some beef meal to go with my baked potato?". Or "May
I have my chicken meal on a bun please?". The meat starts out as human
grade because remember it is from an inspected plant, but does not
receive an inspection sticker because it is not intended for human
consumption so cannot be labeled as human grade. There are different
grades (classifications) of meals however and are graded (classified) by
protein content, ash content and price. Some are of very high quality.
For example, our lamb meal is imported from New Zealand and is a special
low ash high protein (8% ash, 70% protein) lamb meal that we have
classified and most of the bone is filtered out (all lamb, chicken, beef
meals contain a lot of bone because it is made from what is left over
from cutting away steaks or boneless chicken breast for example). It is
the most expensive and probably the best lamb meal in the country as it
is made from the organs and contains a lot of blood which gives it a
very complete amino acid profile. Is it human grade? Come on class, I'm
listening? Most lamb meals are high in ash and are low (50%) in protein.
We searched six different suppliers before finding my current suppliers
for chicken meal and for lamb meal.
So you say
"Fine. What about dog foods that list meat?"
Good
question! Oh what clever readers you are! First, only a handful of mills
have the equipment to add meat. Some companies may list meat but
actually use meal. Of those that actually can add meat it is not quite
what you would expect. It is usually mechanically de boned and mixed
with water to make a slurry that is pumped into the extruder. The most
you can use in a formula is limited to about 30% but can be as little as
3%. What starts out as chicken with 78% moisture is now perhaps 90%
moisture cooked down to 10%. That 30% you started out with is now about
3.3% or less dry matter. To get the protein up you must now add corn
gluten meal or another protein source. Corn gluten meal is a good
protein source, it is high in the sulfur containing amino acids, but a
lot of people (myself included) prefer animal based proteins which means
you must add animal meals which means it is not 100% human grade.
"What
about the other ingredients?" you ask.
The brown
rice I get in looks just like the brown rice on your supermarket shelf,
It is clean and looks indistinguishable. The only difference is that it
does not have an FDA tag on it. Our oats are of exceptional quality.
Higher in linoleic and alpha linoleic acid than locally grown oats
because of the cold (probably grown organically as well) and are the
same oats that are supplied to food processors. Growers do not have
certain fields for dogs and others for people. The point I am trying to
make is that I have trouble believing that a company would pay five
times as much for the same ingredient just to get that FDA sticker. Let
me give you an example: I buy a chicken fat from a company that supplies
soup manufacturers etc. If I buy a tanker of fat it does not have to
have an FDA tag and my price is $.11 per pound. If I buy less it must
have an FDA tag and the price goes to $.58 per pound. Same product. That
chicken fat is apparently human grade but I cannot call it that. A lot
of my ingredients are human grade, some even certified organic but at
the end of the day I can not make the claim 100% human grade because it
is not, but neither can any other company (unless maybe they are
charging $2 - $5 per pound).
Another
example is that if a truck load (40,000 lbs) of frozen whole broilers
were purchased for $.50 per pound, and if a custom chicken meal were
produced, it would be exorbitant in cost. Chicken meal is made from
chicken meat (usually mechanically de boned) that is put into a vat and
is brought to the proper temperature and pH and then enzymes are added.
The meat is broken down into a liquid and either spray dried or roller
dried into a fine powder. Now go back to the truck load of chickens at
$.50 per pound. It takes several pounds of chickens to make one pound of
chicken meal. So let us say 7 pounds times .50 equals $3.50 plus the
rendering charge. Let us assume $4.00 per pound okay? I am using about
50% chicken meal so $4.00/2 is $2.00+ per pound of dog food my cost.
Just for ingredients. Not including herbs, oils, probiotics etc. Does
any of this make sense to some of you?
One
natural dog food company uses poultry meal but lists on their ingredient
label Chicken meal, Turkey meal. AAFCO allows listing animal meals by
particular animal if you know what animal was used in making it. If the
meal is made from more than one animal or a composite you may list all
the animals used in making it. What they mean however is
"Chicken/Turkey" meal for poultry or if you know the exact percentages
than you may list them where they should appear in order of weight on
the label but not Chicken meal, Turkey meal as the first two
ingredients. Chicken meal, Turkey meal gives the impression that the
food is meat based when in fact it is not.
One
question you can ask a dog food company to determine if it is meat based
or grain based is "What percentage of your formula is animal meals?" or
"What is the percentage of protein that is animal based?" or "How many
pounds of animal meals are used per ton of your formula?" They probably
will not tell you or say "That is proprietary." We use 48 to 52%
chicken, lamb or fish meals by weight or 900 to 1100 pounds per ton! Put
another way 91% of our protein is animal based. That is meal not meat.
If someone tells you they use 1000 pounds of meat per ton that is equal
to only 200 pounds of chicken meal or ten percent. Another way is to
look at the calcium content. Chicken, lamb and meat meals are usually 4
- 5% calcium (Special "classified" low ash meals with lower
levels of calcium can be used but are up to 3 times as expensive), so if
a company claims to be using 50% animal meals by weight and their
calcium is only 1.2% then you know something somewhere does not add up.
Or maybe they are using "new" math. The only reason we disclose this is
that it is VERY expensive and not many other companies will do this and
those that do will have to raise their prices. Of course someone may
tell you they use a high amount but if so the kibble should be very
dark. Our Lamb, Barley and Apples is almost black.
Now that
you have read this page, at least you'll know what is in the food. If I
decide to put in goat's eyes, tongue of wren and pickled fish pan fried
in roasted sesame oil you'll know it. None of my formulas contain 4D
animals, simple (read white) carbohydrates, dextrose or other sugars for
palatability enhancement, soy, BHT, BHA or Ethoxyquin. We personally
have sold and used a lot of specialty and super premium foods and have
seen more positive results and heard more positive feed back with this
food than any other. I invite you to go to testimonials page and read
some of the testimonials. I hope I have answered some of your questions,
but don't take my word. Call the FDA or AAFCO or some feed ingredient
suppliers and see what they say.
Sincerely,
Mark
Heyward
Copyright
2000. All rights reserved. |